wch is da best of beast i

mikeh · Post by **mikeh** » 27 Jul 2006, 5:32 pm

But we are going a bit off track fellas.

speedy · Post by **speedy** » 28 Jul 2006, 4:38 pm

well i dont know about how to fit engine parts they r so difficult to fitting so i m buying special performance things from all shops like in shrj ther r many shops who hav diff diff things whc gives power so i buying thm n putting in my car n now a secret garage in al quos which is secret thy r my frnds n fitting performance in ma engine for little money nnn they hav contacts by thm i gettin those special things nnnn buddys i love to drive my car day by day it gives me experiane day by day nnn now i hav to buy a transmission whc has automatic + manual trans means i can drive in auto plus whn i want to drive in manual so i can also drive it same like pajero transmission i think tht name is steptronoc transmission it is worth and it is about 599 dhs
guys only a things is buy a mustang 4.0 v6 n do fun fun n fun
well i buy a red one n i hav put white stripes like mustang shelby

mikeh · Post by **mikeh** » 28 Jul 2006, 5:12 pm

I didn't understand much of what you said but...

Many performance mods, you can do them yourself. So you will save money on your special secret garage friends. A mustang is a relatively heavy car though, i'd suggest with a mustang to strip it first a bit and get the suspension right.. then your car will be more fun already.

Steptronic is never *really* manual, but it's better then slamming it in D and do nothing from there on..

Sparky · Post by **Sparky** » 28 Jul 2006, 5:26 pm

I guess Turbochargers from my limited knowledge are more fuel efficient, use less petrol and only kick in when needed. They do however have lag unlike a SC.

Superchargers use up more gas but have instantly accessible power with no lag.

I guess it would mainly depend on your car application.

Post by **Neo** » 28 Jul 2006, 7:15 pm

Sparky wrote:I guess Turbochargers from my limited knowledge are more fuel efficient, use less petrol and only kick in when needed. They do however have lag unlike a SC.

Superchargers use up more gas but have instantly accessible power with no lag.

I guess it would mainly depend on your car application.

Sparky, depends on the application. Actually TC and SC technology is more fuel efficient than NA.

in stock diesel practical application, mileage, Pollution control and performance is the actual reason for the application

Everyday petrol passenger cars, Performance, pollution control and mileage is the reason.

Sports / Racing, Performance and pollution control.

Too much boost wil require equal amount of fuel to have the right air fuel mixture and hence requires more fuel. Be it SC or TC.

speedy · Post by **speedy** » 29 Jul 2006, 12:12 am

well all from this thread sc is more powerful thn tc but with fuel tc is takin less fuel thn sc ok

Post by **Neo** » 29 Jul 2006, 12:38 am

speedy wrote:well all from this thread sc is more powerful thn tc but with fuel tc is takin less fuel thn sc ok

Nope!! cant agree wit that completely.
depends on applicaton.
I am yet to see 25psi application of an SC.
Seen lot of TC application though.
Fuel consumption varies wit the amount of air in the cylinder.

speedy · Post by **speedy** » 30 Jul 2006, 4:40 pm

well do ny body noe about transmission n wher to get transmission types like steptronic triptronic nnnn etc

ovais · Post by **ovais** » 01 Aug 2006, 10:20 pm

bro if u wnt 2 just cruise and chill out stick with auto....
but if u wnt true driving pleasure like.... basically if u wnt push the throtlle well and gud thn u need a manual
but a steptronic or triptonic trani isnt gonna give u eithr pleasure
cuz the gear changes on a triptonic arent as smooth as a normal auto
and the ability 2 change gears manually on it isnt very responsic it takes a few seconds for the car 2 change gears

Sparky · Post by **Sparky** » 01 Aug 2006, 10:24 pm

Neo, what i meant by more fuel efficient was this...

SCs take away power from your engine to make their power.
TCs, do not take away more power from your engine to make their power.

hence my conclusive opinion that TCs are more fuel-efficient.

Anyhow, if i'm wrong tell me so i may learn, much like a sponge in water.

Post by **Neo** » 01 Aug 2006, 10:37 pm

Sparky wrote:Neo, what i meant by more fuel efficient was this...

SCs take away power from your engine to make their power.
TCs, do not take away more power from your engine to make their power.

hence my conclusive opinion that TCs are more fuel-efficient.

Anyhow, if i'm wrong tell me so i may learn, much like a sponge in water.

Well ur right if u look at it tat way...
I totally agree..

Robbing 20+hp to generate boost by a supercharger is loss...
On a perfect SC application....
when ur gainin 200+hp by losing 20hp on a v8 5+L engine...
Its negligable...

Turbo charger does bring about a bit of backpressure in the exhaust system.... Again negligable as long as it doesnt end up bein restriction..

mikeh · Post by **mikeh** » 02 Aug 2006, 12:20 am

Well turbo's will always generate more power. period.

Superchargers just give you more a "always power on tap" feeling.. and you don't have to wait for a few thousand RPM's to get you power.

Fuel efficiency.. well, with a 2L turbo you can still drive like a normal 2 liter if you never reach boost..

but what kinda life is that?

Sparky · Post by **Sparky** » 02 Aug 2006, 7:44 pm

true dat, mike. god if i had an evo, i think i'd be in boost all the time.

Neo, thanks for clarifying. I guess i should have used the word "efficient" instead of "fuel-efficient".

Post by **Neo** » 02 Aug 2006, 7:48 pm

Sparky wrote:true dat, mike. god if i had an evo, i think i'd be in boost all the time.

Neo, thanks for clarifying. I guess i should have used the word "efficient" instead of "fuel-efficient".

Again u r correct!!!

mike i still wud like u to check out http://www.electricsupercharger.com

Please check the links in it...

I am serious...

If this thing works... it can produce 1psi of boost..

Sparky · Post by **Sparky** » 02 Aug 2006, 8:11 pm

Neo wrote:
Sparky wrote:true dat, mike. god if i had an evo, i think i'd be in boost all the time.

Neo, thanks for clarifying. I guess i should have used the word "efficient" instead of "fuel-efficient".

Again u r correct!!!

mike i still wud like u to check out http://www.electricsupercharger.com

Please check the links in it...

I am serious...

If this thing works... it can produce 1psi of boost..

that link is interesting actually... but i don't know how i would feel about 8 - 10 horses max. i suppose this would be the last mod on my list, since there are other mods available for the same price yielding similar results... lik headers.

good thing is it's not too expensive. if anyone is willing to give it a try, that would be interesting. it seems pretty straightforward to install. dyno's prove to show some increase as well.

UAE Boost Club

UAE Boost Club

wch is da best of beast i